When demockracy is no longer democracy but has become a mere veneer for corporatocracy then peaceful civil disobedience has its place. However, for true legitimacy, it must have the backing of the general public or else the cause is lost.
In 2015, Guardian columnist George Monbiot penned a scathing attack upon the growing grassroots movement protesting the circus in the sky. He still refers to this article of his whenever someone brings up this topic to him again. Therefore I have addressed the points that he made (in italics) one piece at a time.
Contrails are artificially-induced cirrus clouds. Like cirrus clouds they form from ice nucleating on small particles at around 10 km, cruise altitude. These particles, known as ice nuclei, play an essential role in contrail formation. The core of each ice crystal is thus, not ice. Claiming that contrails “are essentially ice” is false and disingenuous, as it leaves out the essential role of these tiny seeds, without which, contrails, contrail cirrus and aviation-induced clouds would simply not occur.
We have established that two modes of climate modification are the real cause of the extreme fluctuations in weather and the accompanying distortions in the jet stream that we have been experiencing of late. Cooling climate modification, the blue pill , operates by forcing high cloud to precipitate and augment lower cloud. One way to ensure that enough ice entrains onto the numerous ice nuclei is to drastically reduce the ambient temperatures at the levels and regions they are dispersed into.
Integrating our vision of the two opposing forms of geoengineering, we can see that the red pill, warming modification shifts the jet stream towards the pole whilst the blue pill, cooling modification shifts the jet stream toward the equator. The interplay between the two, the warming modification acting as the “background”, interspersed with periodic cooling interventions, these opposing forms of climate engineering give rise to the weird jet stream configurations that have been observed in recent times.
Climate scientists claim that global warming amplifies the risk factors for extreme weather events such as floods and droughts. Rising temperatures increase evaporation and evapotranspiration which adds moisture to the atmosphere whilst taking it from soil, plants and water bodies, increasing the frequency and intensity of droughts. As the atmosphere holds more water, the risk of extreme rainfall events increases. Under our hypothesis positing the introduction of an over-seeding regime of aerosols into the upper atmosphere, this retention of water followed by eventual deluges would be greatly exacerbated.
Again, it is important to emphasize the fact, as Big Oil closes in on the Arctic, that the term “HAARP” should actually refer to the technology behind both an overt and covert global network of huge, land-based antenna arrays, sea based mobile platforms, drilling rigs, satellites, land based radar stations (particularly NEXRAD), radar located on vehicles (such as tornado chasers), boats, submarines and aircraft. In other words, “HAARP” in this sense, is ubiquitous.
The HAARP technology, originally patented by Bernard Eastlund, uses high frequencies to focus a powerful radio beam onto specific locations in the ionosphere, 60 – 90 km above the planet’s surface. This layer accumulates electrical energy as a result and is lifted to a higher altitude. The atmospheric “bulge” can then bounce high frequency radio signals, which would previously have passed through the ionosphere, to points over the horizon. It has been speculated that elevating the ionosphere grants the ability to alter the course of jet streams and so influence the weather.
Rather than viewing all weather and climate as being manipulated by a single, obscure facility that sounds ominous, but looks more like a communal clothes-drying area, it would be better to think of “HAARP” as a meme, a perpetuating idea, like “radio” or “radar,” manifesting in a variety of technical forms with a similar function.
From 1998 onwards, as global warming skeptics never tire of reiterating, the rise in global surface temperatures slowed. Certainly, over this period relatively low solar activity and high volcanic activity has resulted in less solar energy reaching the Earth’s surface. In part 14 we postulated that, from around the mid-90’s, the introduction of cooling climate modification interspersed with the warming modification has also contributed significantly to the slowdown in the rise of global surface temperatures.