Update from
COVAX through the Looking Glass part 4
In the UK, as of 21st January
52,186,398 people (95.7% of the population aged 16 and over) have received the first dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
48,082,636 people (88% of the population aged 16 and over) have received the second dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
36,753,644 people (67.4% of the population aged 16 and over) have received the third dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
Only this 67.4% of the adult aged 16 and over is now considered fully “vaccinated”
1,932 deaths and 1,414,293 injuries following COVID19 experimental “vaccines” in the U.K.
“Rare adverse events are defined as those occurring in 1/1000 to 1/10,000 patients”
Thus 0.1% – 0.01% of a vaccinated population experiencing adverse events is considered rare.
The UK currently works out as having 2.7% of the Covid vaccinated population (1 or more doses) experiencing adverse events. This is using official MHRA figures.
Covid vaccine adverse events are therefore not rare, even without considering the under-reported nature of vaccine adverse events.
The MHRA itself claims that only 10% of serious adverse reactions are reported:
“But all spontaneous reporting schemes have a problem with numbers: the MHRA itself says that only 10% of serious reactions and 2–4% of all reactions are reported using the Yellow Card Scheme. This means that most iatrogenic morbidity goes unreported. It’s not as if adverse reactions are unusual.”
This was the case before 2020. It is logical to assume that such biases are likely to be amplified in the hysterical atmosphere that the world now finds itself in.
This means that the number of serious adverse events in the UK could be as high as 14,142,930 – 27% of the vaccinated population.
The official number of deaths works out at 0.0037% of the vaccinated population receiving 1 dose or more. The real number of deaths could be as high as 19,320 – 0.037%.
Dr Dolores Cahill, molecular biologist/immunologist and specialist in the diagnosis of auto-immune diseases & cancer, predicted that there would be adverse events, serious anaphylactic reactions from the first dose (in around 2.5% of people) and second dose (perhaps 10%, even 80% for those over 80). Around 80% of the over-80’s receiving the vaccine would have life-limiting reactions or even death from the second dose.
Taking into account the under-reported nature of serious vaccine adverse events admitted by the MHRA, we see that a realistic estimate – 27% surpasses Dr Cahill’s prediction of 10% from those receiving the second dose.
In the EU:
80.9% have received the 2nd dose
49.1% have received the booster
As of January 19th , 2022:
The European Medicines Agency reports:
37,927 deaths and 3,392,632 injuries in reaction to the COVID-19 “vaccines”
A realistic estimate of EU Covid vaccine injuries would be in the region of 33,926,320 injuries (10.9% of the adult vaccinated population) and 379,270 deaths (0.122% of the vaccinated population).
These estimates are in line with Dr Cahill’s predictions.
In the US:
As of 20th January 2022:
VAERS COVID REPORTS
(Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)
From the 1/14/2022 release of VAERS data:
22,193 deaths (0.01% of the vaccinated population) and 1,053,830 injuries (0.5% of the vaccinated population) following COVID19 experimental “vaccines” in the US.
Experts admit that the US VAERS system suffers from far worse under-reporting compared to the UK system, with a mere 1% of vaccine adverse events being reported.
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”
A realistic estimate of US Covid vaccine injuries would therefore be in the region of 10,538,300 to 105,383,000 injuries (5% to 50% of the vaccinated population) and 220,193 to 2,219,300 deaths (0.1% to 1% of the vaccinated population).
These estimates surpass Dr Cahill’s predictions as to the earlier effects.
So, a conservative estimate is that 10% of people who are subjected to this vaccine seem to suffer from serious adverse effects and around 0.1% are killed outright within a short time frame.
A major contributing factor is that the first line immune system is effectively shut down by the “vaccines”.
What Explains Rising Cases Among the Vaccinated?
Dr Mike Williams writing his third article on the Covid vaccine for the UK column, relates evidence that suggests the intrinsic component of the innate immune system can actually be altered, and posits this as the likely mechanism for the vaccine’s observed effects of hampering this primary means of defence against pathogens and cancerous cells.
Formerly considered non-specific, the innate immune system has recently been shown to have an adaptive function generated through epigenetics. The prefix epi translates as “over, outside of, around.” Indeed, this emerging field is mainstream science’s attempt to get “around” the problem of the inheritance of acquired characters that cannot be ascribed to genetics alone.
Most often, epigenetics centres on factors that influence gene expression such as the activities of certain protein and RNA molecules on chemical attachments to genes, particularly methyl groups. This process “switches genes on or off.”
However, the field covers all inherited phenotypic alterations – all the observable characteristics of an individual arising from interaction with the environment.
Even fear of certain stimuli can be passed down families, as Dr Rupert Sheldrake notes:
“For example, in a recent study with mice, the fears of the fathers were passed on to their children and grandchildren. Male mice were made averse to the smell of a synthetic chemical, acetophenone, by being given mild electric shocks when they smelled it. For at least two generations, their offspring reacted with fear to this smell, even though they had never been exposed to it before.”
Neither the RNA molecules and the proteins they code for – the components of epigenetics, nor indeed the components of genetics – the DNA molecules, code for the plan, the form that the body or behaviour of an organism takes. According to Sheldrake, this is the role of morphogenetic fields, containing and transcending the concept of genes and epi-genes, operating non-locally, around and within the molecules, that regulate the fields of both form and behaviour.
Let us now return to Dr Mike Williams, who posits that the immune system, including the innate, also naturally possesses an ability to adapt epigenetically. He shares public literature demonstrating that those naturally infected and recovered from genuine covid infections exhibit trained immunity of the innate immune system.
Contrasting this with those vaccinated, Dr Williams refers to English data showing that as more of the population is vaccinated, the less the protection and the greater the risk of infection compared to the unvaccinated.
Confusingly, along with the increased infection rate, there was purported to be an apparent decreased mortality rate. Vaccine apologists have bent themselves out of shape claiming that although the vaccine does not prevent infection, it reduces severity and death.
This is contrary to logic – increased viral loads should lead to increased mortality. If the vaccinated exhibit greater viral loads than the unvaccinated, but die less often, then the vaccine is not behaving as a vaccine, as the reduction of viral loads is the only mechanism whereby a vaccine can reduce the risk of death.
The problem is resolved however, when we learn that, mysteriously, over 10 million people, vaccination status unknown, are missing from the PHE/ONS data.
More importantly, the mortality reports vastly underestimate the number of vaccinated people both single and double dose. When rectifying these gaping holes in the data, Professor Fenton and his team found that all-cause mortality for vaccinated people, compared to unvaccinated people is higher.
These underestimates in the number of vaccinated people may, in large part, derive from sinister distortion in the definition of vaccinated and unvaccinated.
“At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support vaccine effectiveness-at least for the older age groups-on closer inspection of this data, this conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data.”
“By Occam’s razor we believe the most likely explanations are systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated; and/or incorrect population selection for Covid deaths.”
Professor Norman Fenton of Queen Mary’s University.
“In fact, if you take account of the fact that newly vaccinated people who die are likely being misclassified as unvaccinated, because that’s the most likely explanation for the strange things in the data, then you get to the conclusion that the vaccines don’t seem to be reducing all-cause mortality rather produce a genuine spike in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination.”
The media reports the exact inversion of the truth
Curiously, there is a lower non-covid related mortality rate for the vaccinated and for each age group, the unvaccinated mortality rate peaks at the same time as the vaccine roll-out peaks.
“The unvaccinated seem to be dying after NOT getting the first dose and the single-dosed are dying after NOT getting the second dose.”
The simple explanation is that the vaccinated that have died within 14 days of vaccination are being categorised as unvaccinated. Something similar is occurring after the second dose.
“We believe that the most likely explanations are systematic mis-categorization.”
Peaks of deaths in the vaccinated fraudulently categorized as unvaccinated deaths.
Dr Williams’ conclusion is that the data, when truly represented, reveals that there is indeed a higher mortality rate in the vaccinated along with the higher infection rate, as one would expect.
He links this pattern with the impairing effects of the vaccine on the innate immune system, particularly the toll-like receptors. We have mentioned his previous article outlining the role of suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors on cells leading to inhibiting T cell response to infection and cancer.
Recall that the vaccine developers found a means to modify the RNA code – the nucleoside uridine, enabling the foreign vaccine mRNA to enter cells without being destroyed.
Dr Williams asks the question as to whether the immune response of the vaccinated is impaired, even to a life-threatening extent.
As Joel Smalley shows, using data published from the government in Alberta, Canada, nearly half of all Covid hospitalizations of the newly vaccinated occur within 14 days, almost 56% of deaths within that same time frame and almost 90% of deaths within 45 days.
Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats.
According to Dr Mercola, 50% of the Covid “vaccine” deaths in the US, occur within 48 hours of injection.
“It’s simply not conceivable that 10,000 people died two days after their shot from something other than the shot. It cannot all be coincidence. Especially since so many of them are younger, with no underlying lethal conditions that threaten to take them out on any given day. A full 80% have died within one week of their jab, which is still incredibly close in terms of temporality.”
This of course is not limited to Canada or the US, but holds across the “vaccinated” world.
COVID Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs
Dr Cahill’s main prediction was that it would be after several months, a year, or several years that the truly adverse events would occur. They would be due to the immune super priming, the setting up of auto-immune disease and cytokine storms as outlined above in this article. The mRNA in the body would express the viral protein, and the immune system would see antigens in the body’s own cells and organs and attack them. The binding antibodies induced would then enhance the entry of the wild virus and other common viruses into the cells and trigger further immunopathology. Those with co-morbidities would have exhausted cells and be unable to resist the onset of organ failure, sepsis, and death.
This is also what Dr Sucharit Bhakdi of the Doctors for Covid Ethics predicted and has observed. He added the insight that this immune attack on the endothelial cells lining the blood vessels would lead to clotting, strokes, heart attacks and thromboses. The rupturing of the blood vessel walls would enable the invasion of the mRNA, spike proteins and weaponized immune cells into every nook and cranny of the body.
Indeed, the Doctors for Covid Ethics published the work of Dr Bhakdi and Dr Burkhardt and colleagues in carrying out autopsies on 15 people deceased in connection with covid vaccines where no link had previously been established. Dr Burkhadt found that all cases exhibited unprecedented pervasive T-lymphocyte-dominated pathology and immunological self-attack.
“Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs. That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident.”
In Nov 2021 a paper was published in the prestigious journal “Circulation” by Steven R Gundry, physician and former cardiac surgeon.
His clinic documented the results from the PULS Cardiac Test carried out on 566 patients aged 28 to 97, 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd mRNA COVID shot. This was compared to the same patient’s PULS test carried out 3 to 5 months previously, pre-shot.
It was found that the mRNA shots significantly increased the markers for endothelial inflammation and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle from 11% to 25% . The risk of heart attack over 5 years was more than doubled.
In late November, Dr Aseem Malhotra, in an interview with GB news, revealed this study and reported that he had been contacted by a cardiac researcher from another prestigious institution, this time British, who reported they had found similar results within the coronary arteries using imaging showing an increased risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine. However, this institution had decided not publish these findings for fear of losing funding from the drug industry. Maholtra also reported that he had heard numerous anecdotal evidence that younger and younger people were being hospitalized with heart attacks.
It would seem that the younger cells of the younger recipients of the covid “vaccines” take up the genetic/epigenetic material more readily than their older counterparts. This means these cells will express more spike proteins and have a more aggressive immune response as the T-cells take out those cells targeted for destruction. This response will also be more pervasive throughout the body and particularly harmful to the cardiac tissue which does not regenerate to a great extent. This is why it has been stated by such experts as Dr Anthony Hinton that myocarditis results in 2 in 10 people dead after 2 years and 5 in 10 after 5 years.
The excellent Daily Expose shows that worldwide professional football / soccer match cardiovascular deaths in 2021 were 300% higher than the 12-year average, with the number of deaths occurring in December 2021 alone equalling the 2009-2020 average.
“This does not mean that sporting people are all now 4x more likely to suffer a heart attack. It means that vaccinated sporting people are somewhere around 6 or 7 times more likely to suffer a heart attack than unvaccinated sporting people because only around two thirds of pro footballers are vaccinated, and these are the ones that will be suffering death and making up the numbers.”
This suggests that the doubling of heart attack risk revealed by the PULS study may in reality be even worse as time goes on.
Support for such concerns is found when one looks at pro-footballer deaths per quarter in 2021.
It is clear that deaths are doubling every quarter.
The Expose rightly points out that these deaths cannot be hidden from the public eye and represent the visible tip of the ice-berg of vaccine mortality.
Some of invisible part of the ice-berg can be gleaned from the official government data which reveals that an immune system subjected to chronic overreaction becomes depleted leading to an insidious immunodeficiency syndrome.
“the Official Government data from around the world now suggests that all double and triple vaccinated people are developing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.”
“Australian, UK and Scottish figures all show that double vaccinated people are twice as likely to become infected with Covid-19 than unvaccinated people.”
As the T cells are knocked out following vaccination, so is the production of interferons, those proteins which prevent viral replication within cells.
The antibodies induced by this gene editing technology are ostensibly based on a 2019 iteration of the virus and so 3 years out of date. Therefore, as time passes, they take on the ever more severe characteristics of binding antibodies, those antibodies associated with ADE, outlined at the beginning of this article, first posted in February 2021.
Not only that, but because the “vaccine” specifically targets the spike protein it produces predominantly S antibodies to the detriment of the N antibodies that are also induced through natural immunity. The N antibodies target the nucleocapsid part of the virus which encases the nucleus. Natural immunity is more effective and not pathogenic.
It has been shown that unvaccinated individuals exposed to the virus and developed natural immunity have S antibodies and N antibodies. Natural immunity lasts indefinitely and is 8 times more broad-based.
In contrast vaccinated individuals generate S antibodies, perhaps the single most harmful type of antibody in history, but production of N antibodies is drastically impaired. This kind of immunity is not immunity at all as it is decimated and decimates its body’s own cells over time.
It’s almost as if this was designed this way….
Since the introduction of jabs in the UK:
Age
2-14 24% more deaths compared to 5-year average
15-19 16% more deaths compared to 5-year average
20-24 16% more deaths compared to 5-year average
25-29 9% more deaths compared to 5-year average
30-34 15% more deaths compared to 5-year average
35-39 17% more deaths compared to 5- year average
40-44 17% more deaths compared to 5-year average
45-49 5% more deaths compared to 5-year average
50-54 8% more deaths compared to 5-year average
55-59 12% more deaths compared to 5-year average
60-64 11% more deaths compared to 5-year average
65-69 1% more deaths compared to 5-year average
70-74 10% more deaths compared to 5-year average
75-79 12% more deaths compared to 5-year average
80-84 4% more deaths compared to 5-year average
85-89 1% more deaths compared to 5-year average
90+ 3% more deaths compared to 5-year average
Source ONS All-Cause Mortality 1970-2020
Source ONS All-Cause Mortality 2021 Weekly Update
Shout out to Chris Littlewood
Note the 24% increase in excess deaths for 2-14 year-olds compared to the 5-year average since the introduction of the jabs.
Tragically, as I have stated before, the zombified masses may only fully wake up when the lethal consequences of this program are unleashed upon their children.
We are here.
Once again, the Daily Expose nails it:
“Even more disturbing, British data show deaths among teenagers have spiked since that age group became eligible for the COVID shots. Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths were reported among 15- to 19-year-olds. Between the week ending June 25, 2021, and the week ending September 17, 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s an increase of 47%!
Deaths from COVID-19 also went up among 15- to 19-year-olds after the shots were rolled out for this age group. An investigation of Office for National Statistics data has revealed that since the Covid-19 vaccine began to be rolled-out to teenagers there has been a 53% rise in the number of deaths due to all-causes among males aged 15-19, and each spike in deaths correlates perfectly with a spike in administration of the first, second, and third doses of the Covid-19 injection to this age group.”
Official Government data suggests the Covid-19 Vaccines have killed more Children than Covid-19
But there is hope.
The tide does seem to be turning as the Metamorphic Butterfly Effect grows in coherence and power as I predicted it would in April last year:
COVAX through the Looking Glass part 5
In the UK at least, the powers that be appear to be carrying out an organized retreat as their gigantic bluff – mandatory jabs for NHS works implodes before their very eyes as more and more people unite behind the 10% NHS staff from all over the UK, some of whom laid their uniforms on the steps of Trafalgar Square.
I feel that the UK may be the lynchpin in the planetary pandemic police state machine. This is because the other countries, even the US, seem to be in lockstep with perfidious Albion, the dark heart of the Vaxx agenda.
Baker Street Rising 
Thank you so much Hugh for an amazing article.
I found your site back in May ’21 (“Looking Glass part 5”) and dropped you a word of thanks then. Been lurking, reading and learning ever since 😉
I continue to try to keep abreast of much of the research and information coming to light as time goes on. There are so many wonderful academics, researchers, scientists and doctors exposing the truth (often at great cost to themselves), but it can be difficult keeping much of their output in a merged format that is structured and easy to reference. I am therefore grateful that you have taken so much time and effort to put all of the current/latest findings into your article – it is a brilliant reference piece.
Most of my family and friends are still lost in the matrix, but several are more open to discussion, ask questions and listen to my answers. A couple are now actually “awake” and on-board, although unfortunately, I am the only person I know who has not pulled up my sleeve 😦
Thank you again for being willing to share your work. God Bless – Jackie D
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jackie your words show me just how worthwhile my efforts have been. Thank you for sharing and not giving up on your family and friends. They will become more and more open as we progress in time.
LikeLiked by 1 person