COVAX through the Looking Glass part 4

And if you go chasing rabbits, and you know you’re going to fall

Update – January 24th

Update – September 18th

Immune Primer

In an experiment in 2017, New Zealand white rabbits were inoculated with a zoonotic coronavirus – MERS-Cov. The rabbits became sick and developed antibodies, the measure of success for a vaccine. With most viral illnesses, once you recover, you won’t contract the illness again. However, the antibodies developed by these rabbits were a different sort to those that normally block infection – known as neutralizing anti-bodies. These antibodies were what is known as non-neutralizing or binding antibodies. When the rabbits encountered the MERS a second time, the binding antibodies actually facilitated the entry of the virus into the cells and they became even more severely ill than previously.

As the authors noted:

“In fact, reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation, without an associated increase in viral RNA titers,”

Further down the rabbit hole and back in time to 2012, Chinese, American and European scientists had been working on a vaccine for the first SARS-Cov virus since 2002, following 3 outbreaks. Of the 30 promising candidates, the best 4 were selected for testing on ferrets, the closest analogue to human lung infections. They all developed robust antibody responses. However, as in the case with the rabbits, these were binding antibodies, and on contact with the wild virus they all became severely ill and died.

Back still further to the 1960’s, a vaccine was developed for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), very similar to coronaviruses. No animals were tested, trials went straight to humans, children in fact. Again, the children developed robust binding anti-bodies and on contact with the wild virus, all became sick, two of them dying. The vaccine was shutdown.

Antibody-dependent enhancement

All these vaccines, and numerous others, revealed a disturbing tendency to trigger what is known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This term is rather misleading, enhancement implying something desired.

It refers in fact to:

“A phenomenon in which antibodies raised against a previous infection or vaccination can enhance the pathogenesis of a subsequent infection, by the same or similar virus.”

The enhancement refers to the ability of the virus to enter and infect cells, enhancing the severity of the disease. The binding antibodies assist the entry, shutting down of anti-viral responses and increasing replication of the virus into monocytes and granulocytic cells, the white blood cells responsible for immunity.

On the left we have a healthy immune response where the neutralizing anti-bodies impair virus infectivity and interfere with protein fusion.

On the right we have a dysfunctional immune response where the binding antibody enhances viral fusion and entry.

Cell-based enhancement

Another related immune dysfunction – Th2 immunopathology, due to cell-based enhancement of T cells, which triggers hyperinflammation, also known as a cytokine storm, where the body attacks its own cells and tissues, in ways similar to auto-immune diseases, also plays a role in this strange dysfunction.

T cells are responsible for directly killing infected host cells, activating other immune cells and producing cytokines, the proteins that regulate the immune response. The dysfunctional Spike-Protein-induced anti-bodies in this case activate a storm of excessive levels of cytokines signalling immune cells to attack even healthy cells and tissues. This sets off a cascade of pro-inflammatory responses, metabolic perturbations, elevating the levels of reactive oxygen species – free radicals, leading to serious harm and even death.

a) In a healthy immune response, neutralizing antibodies bind the viral spike protein and prevent the virus from docking onto its entry receptor.

b) In a dysfunctional response, low quality, low quantity, non-neutralizing (binding) antibodies bind to virus particles. Receptors expressed on monocytes or macrophages bind to the antibodies and facilitate viral entry and infection.

 c) In antibody-mediated immune enhancement, low quality, low quantity, non-neutralizing  (binding) antibodies bind to virus particles. Upon contact with receptors on immune cells, these antibodies signal increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and decreased anti-inflammatory cytokines. Immune complexes (antigen-antibody) and viral RNA in the endosomes shutdown anti-viral activity within the host immune cell while simultaneously signalling activation of immunopathologic responses.

The evidence is strong that the elderly and immunocompromised are the most vulnerable to both ADE and Th2 immunopathology.

Trojan Horse

Traditional vaccines use inactivated or live, attenuated pathogens that are purported to teach the body to defeat a pathogen without getting sick. The immune system produces antibodies which attach to antigens on the surface of a pathogen, signalling to the body to attack the invader.

We have seen that coronavirus vaccines previously developed in the traditional mode have brought bloody carnage upon their test subjects whether white rabbits, ferrets or humans due to the nature of coronaviruses. Other animals such as rhesus macaques, mice and cats when vaccinated with the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV virus, have all demonstrated severe acute lung injury when challenged with SARS-CoV.

These viruses hijack the immune response and actually use it to weaken cells and proliferate within them.

“This ‘trojan horse’ strategy allows the invading virus to infect a cell, escape from its endosome, and induce altered immune mediators that impair the immune system to facilitate a more aggressive pathogenesis.”

Their induced activity has been compared to auto-immune disease as scientists for this study observed:

“We observed the same type of B-cell activity we see in lupus flares, and also similar antibody activity,” says Ignacio Sanz, MD.

These vaccines run the risk of facilitating this process. Numerous studies have advised caution in proceeding with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans.

“Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.”

“Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”

Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus

Enter the new breed of fast-tracked biological interventions masquerading as “vaccines”.

An mRNA “vaccine” works in a different fashion by providing the genetic code needed for the body to produce the antigen itself. It is gene technology.

As Bill Gates puts it:

“When the antigens appear on the outside of your cells, your immune system attacks them—and learns how to defeat future intruders in the process. You essentially turn your body into its own vaccine manufacturing unit.”

The mRNA “vaccine” uses mRNA coated within a lipid nanoparticle to enter your cells and instruct them to manufacture and express antigens. In this case the infamous SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, or a rather a piece of it, expressed on the surface of the cell membrane so that the cell looks like a coronavirus to the immune system.

This is very close to what the virus itself does, using the spike protein to attach to the ACE2 receptors of the cell and gain entry. Once inside, the RNA is released from its coating and hijacks the ribosomes of the host cell to create new viral RNA. It replicates itself. This new viral RNA then assembles new viral particles which leave the cell to enter new cells. To counter this, the cell itself presents pieces of proteins, the antigens, on its surface. In this case it will be the spike protein or a fragment of it. This signals to the B cells of the immune system to form antibodies to fit the antigen and to the T cells to kill the body’s own cells already infected with the virus.

Instead of a “live” virus with its protein shell, the mRNA “vaccine” has a lipid nanoparticle coating to protect it from the body’s enzymes and to facilitate its transfer across the cell membrane. It is injected directly, bypassing many of the body’s defences. Once inside, it also hijacks the ribosomes of the host cell but this time with the instructions to manufacture the spike protein or part of it and to express that on the surface of the cell. This is similar to how the viral-infected cell presents protein antigens on its surface to signal to the immune system. However, unlike the virus, the current mRNA “vaccines” do not replicate themselves. I say “current” because the Imperial college vaccine, still under quiet development, makes use of self-amplifying RNA injected into muscle cells. This RNA has enzymes that can copy itself, replicating much like the virus does.

For all these “vaccines”, the spike protein is produced and expressed on the cell membrane, inducing an immune response with B cells forming antibodies and T cells attacking cells that, this time, it “thinks” are infected. The reasoning behind this is that it is hoped a protective memory will remain, enabling the body to deal with a real infection.

Of the utmost importance here is which type of antibody will be induced. Will it be neutralizing or binding anti-bodies?

If binding antibodies are produced, then as we have seen, they may facilitate the infiltration and replication of the “wild” Sars-Cov2, and perhaps other coronaviruses into the cells. ADE is a common problem with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, along with the family of coronaviruses. Several strains of coronavirus are responsible for the common cold whilst around 10% of coronaviruses cause flu-like symptoms.

The binding antibodies may also trigger other immunopathologic responses, a storm of cytokines leading to over-inflammation attacking healthy cells and tissues at the same time as the infected cells have had their anti-viral responses shutdown.

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and Michael Yeadon address this concern in their petition to the European Medicines Agency. They point out that one of the proteins that make up the spike protein, Syncytin-1, is responsible for the development of the placenta in mammals and humans and so essential for pregnancy. The risk is that the induced antibodies may also target this compound leading to infertility.

Perhaps an even greater risk is that the engineered spike protein, the “key” may bond with the “lock”, the ACE2 receptor, found on the surface of the cell, forming an immune complex. This could lead to the formation of autoantibodies against ACE2. An autoantibody is a type of protein that is directed against one or more of the individual’s own proteins. Many autoimmune diseases are caused by such autoantibodies.

“The development of autoantibodies to ACE2 might predict the development of the inflammatory phase of Covid-19 disease.”

The risk is compounded when factoring in the increased ACE2 expression in the cells of patients with hypertension (high blood pressure), enhancing uptake of the virus into cells that express ACE2 in the lungs, heart, blood vessels and kidneys and inflammation at those sites.

The reason why the immune system mistakenly attacks its own cells and tissues partly lies in what is termed “molecular mimicry.” The similarities between the amino acid sequences of proteins of the virus and human proteins confuses the immune system, causing it to attack its own cells, tissues and organs, continuing even after the true viral-infected cells have been destroyed.

A “vaccine” or rather, a form of genetic manipulation that compels the cells to express coronavirus spike proteins on their membranes is only going to exacerbate the confusion of the immune system.

Despite full knowledge of these inconvenient facts, the pharmaceutical industry has planned well ahead for this. In 2017, Bill Gates collaborated with the governments of Norway, India, Japan, and Germany along with the Wellcome Trust – a British research charity, in launching the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). This alliance was to invest in the accelerated development of vaccines. They made it clear that they would support whatever it took to find a vaccine for COVID-19. This included compressing the development timeline and financing numerous facilities to manufacture the many different potential vaccines at the same time. As Gates states:

If some of those facilities end up going unused, that’s okay. It’s a small price to pay for getting ahead on production.”

Only it we know it won’t be a small price. One vaccine, normally developed over a 5-10 year period, costs around $1 billion.

This threatens to repeat, on a far grander scale, the fiasco of the fast-tracked H1N1 swine flu vaccine released in Europe during the swine flu pandemic of 2009-2010 which led to tragic consequences for an untold number of children and teens across Europe. In the UK, for example, the predicted fatalities from the virus itself were 65,000 (courtesy again of Neil Ferguson) but turned out, in actuality, to be 457. It left a stockpile of over 20 million unused doses of swine flu vaccine and cost around £1 billion.

And of course, the real price may well be counted in great numbers of human lives. As we have seen, previous coronavirus vaccines have already been shown to work opposite to their stated intent and actually worsen infection.

“Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus.

The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine …

‘I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,’ Dr Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters.”

Hotez is a prominent pro-mandatory vaccination propagandist so this issue clearly goes beyond the polarized debate of anti-vaxxers versus pro-vaxxers.

Wodarg and Yeadon also draw attention to a compound, polyethylene glycol (PEG), found in the lipid nanoparticle surrounding the mRNA in Pfizer’s “vaccine.” The concern is that 70% of people unwittingly develop antibodies to PEG leading to the potential for severe or even deadly allergic reactions before the vaccine has even entered the body’s cells to begin inducing immune responses.

Dr Judy Mikovits has concerns about the artificial stability of the mRNA and links that to PEG and Syncytin.

“Normally, messenger RNA is not free in your body because it’s a danger signal. As a molecular biologist, the central dogma of molecular biology is that our genetic code, DNA, is transcribed, written, into the messenger RNA. That messenger RNA is translated into protein, or used in a regulatory capacity … to regulate gene expression in cells.

So, taking a synthetic messenger RNA and making it thermostable — making it not break down — [is problematic]. We have lots of enzymes (RNAses and DNAses) that degrade free RNA and DNA because, again, those are danger signals to your immune system. They literally drive inflammatory diseases.

Now you’ve got PEG, PEGylated and polyethylene glycol, and a lipid nanoparticle that will allow it to enter every cell of the body and change the regulation of our own genes with this synthetic RNA, part of which actually is the message for the gene syncytin …

Syncytin is the endogenous gammaretrovirus envelope that’s encoded in the human genome … We know that if syncytin … is expressed aberrantly in the body, for instance in the brain, which these lipid nanoparticles will go into, then you’ve got multiple sclerosis.”

V for Vector

We will now take a look at the UK government’s flagship Oxford vaccine, developed by AstraZeneca, and run by the Jenner Institute and Oxford Vaccine Group, which as we saw in part 3, was surreptitiously maneuvered to the forefront of the “vaccine” rollout in the UK.

Named “ChAdOx1 nCoV-19”,  it is a type of immunisation known as a recombinant viral vector vaccine.

This is a method of immunization that uses live replicating viruses that have been engineered to carry extra genes derived from a pathogen that produce the proteins against which the body generates immunity. The instructions are carried by the genetically engineered virus which infects the cell to deliver the required genes. The idea is the same except with a real virus as the vector rather than a lipid coating.

The segment of code that instructs for the spike protein is identified. Note that, contrary to popular belief, this segment has not been extracted from an isolated sample of Sars-Cov2. Rather it has been sequenced from the 3rd iteration of the original WUHAN published Genome SARS-CoV-2 (MN908947.3) and replicated in the lab.

As stated by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA):

“The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.”

This engineered segment is inserted into the chimpanzee adenovirus that acts as the viral vector.

Once injected, the genetically-modified adenovirus gains entry to cell, and then enters the cell nucleus.

The engineered DNA overrides the functioning of the nucleus and instructs it to produce spike proteins and fragments of spike protein which are then expressed on the cell membrane.

When a “vaccinated” cell dies and is broken down, the spike proteins and protein fragments left behind can be ingested by an antigen-presenting cell, a type of immune cell. This cell will then also present spike protein fragments on its cell membrane. Helper T cells will recognise these fragments and marshal further immune responses.

Other immune cells such as B cells make contact with and lock onto spike proteins on the surface of vaccinated cells or onto free-floating fragments. Then the B cells are activated by Helper T cells to generate antibodies targeting spike proteins.

When the immune response is functioning correctly, the neutralising antibodies latch onto coronavirus spikes, marking the virus for destruction and blocking further attachment to cells.

Antigen-presenting cells activate another kind of immune cell – the Killer T cell, to find and destroy coronavirus-infected cells that express the spike protein fragments on their surface membranes.

Important to remember that the killer T cells will also be destroying non-coronavirus-infected cells that have been engineered to express the antigens on their surfaces. If the immune response is not functioning correctly, the binding antibodies will latch onto the spikes and facilitate the entry of the virus, and others like it, into cells, particularly antigen- presenting cells by means of the Fc receptors.

Once inside the cell, the virus can shut down the anti-viral response and then replicate. At the same time, as the host is an immune cell, this stimulates the release of inflammatory cytokines. These in turn trigger immune responses which attack cells presenting spike proteins, including “vaccinated” cells. The destroyed cells release spike-protein fragments which are picked up and expressed by antigen-presenting cells and the vicious cycle continues, releasing excessive levels of cytokines and leading to destruction of healthy cells and tissue, metabolic disruption and release of reactive oxygen species – free radicals.

The Oxford “vaccine” uses an adenovirus as the vector. It is claimed that this adenovirus is a weakened form of the cold virus that affects chimpanzees and that it has been genetically altered so that it does not replicate.  However, it is also claimed that this adenovirus itself stimulates the immune system to activate nearby cells and react more strongly to the manufactured spike proteins. Further risk of a cytokine storm event.

It should raise one or two eyebrows that the AstraZeneca vaccine sounds very much like the kind of viral vector vaccine that Professor Luc Montagnier, French Nobel Prize winner and co-discoverer of HIV, claimed leaked out of the Wuhan lab, namely Sars-Cov 2 itself.

“No, it’s not natural. It’s a lab work of professional molecular biologists. It’s a very accurate work… we can say a work of watchmaker…”

 “The possibility is probably they wanted to make a vaccine against the Aids. So, they took small sequences of the virus and they installed them on the larger sequence of the coronavirus.”

 “And these sequences are not small for nothing; they have the possibility to modify what we call, for example, the antigens sites. This means that if we want to make a vaccine, we can modify the protein subject to the vaccine by a small sequence coming from another virus.”

“There’s a will to suppress the works on the subject. We are not the first. A group of renowned Indian researchers have published the same thing. But they forced them to retract it.”

Coronaviruses are considered ideal candidates for viral vectors:

“Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-stranded RNA viruses considered to be promising vectors for vaccine development, as (i) genes can be deleted, resulting in attenuated viruses; (ii) their tropism can be modified by manipulation of their spike protein; and (iii) heterologous genes can be expressed by simply inserting them with appropriate coronaviral transcription signals into the genome.”

Consider that the Astrazeneca viral-vector vaccine may be inserting the sequence that was itself inserted onto the coronavirus, namely that for a protein of HIV, the virus purported to be responsible for Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Gene Therapy or Injury?

Viruses can be differentiated according to whether they have DNA or RNA. RNA viruses have higher mutation rates than DNA viruses, they evolve faster and so have greater genetic diversity. This is one reason why effective vaccines against RNA viruses are difficult to make.

It also contributes to the common occurrence of ADE with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, and the family of coronaviruses – all RNA viruses. As viruses undergo changes to the amino acid sequence of the Spike protein a phenomenon known as antigenic drift can occur. This means that an antibody that was once neutralizing can become a non-neutralizing (binding) antibody due to changes in the antigen. As RNA viruses frequently mutate, the risk of ADE is very real.

Other viruses, such as adenoviruses, have DNA. They introduce their DNA introduce into the host nucleus but not the chromosome. Or so it is claimed. They use the machinery in the nucleus to replicate the role of the DNA in producing mRNA according to their own genetic coding. The host DNA remains unchanged and will be passed on unchanged.

The technology using adenoviruses as viral vectors uses the genes from genetically modified viruses to override the function of the host’s DNA according to the inserted code. In this sense they are a form of genetic engineering using foreign genes, without altering the DNA of the host. Whilst the genes of the host organism are not altered (so it is claimed), the genetic expression of the host is altered.

Some viruses, such as retroviruses, have RNA which they integrate into human chromosomes and so change human DNA in a way that will be passed on. HIV and Hepatitis B are retroviruses. We even have retroviruses hardwired into our genome called endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). These ERV’s have instructions to produce enzymes called “reverse transcriptases” which “reverse transcribe” RNA into DNA. Endogenous and exogenous retroviruses all produce these enzymes in abundance. Our own DNA even produces reverse transcriptases for such functions as extending the telomeres at the end of chromosomes. These enzymes convert single-stranded RNA into double-stranded DNA. This new DNA can then be integrated into the host DNA in the nucleus through another enzyme called DNA integrase.

Gene technology using retroviruses as viral vectors thus alters the genes of the host organism.

Dr Doug Corrigan argues that it is possible for the RNA introduced into our cells via the vaccine to be reverse transcribed into human DNA and integrated into the nucleus. The chances of this occurring are greater if the RNA finds its way into the stem cells which act as a reservoir for new cells. The genetically-modified stem cells could then replace an increasingly larger percentage of the host’s somatic cells over time.

Why don’t viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 pose the same threat?

They do to a certain extent. However, viral RNA is unstable and quickly recognized by cellular enzymes for destruction. It also spends most of the time packaged into viral particles. This means there is relatively little time for reverse transcriptase to work on viral RNA. Artificial RNA on the other hand, is designed to remain intact for much longer. The probability that a molecular pathway could be found that results in this RNA being converted into DNA is much higher in the opinion of Dr Corrigan, who seems to have overlapping concerns with Dr Judy Mikovits. Repeated “vaccination” programs over time have a chance of genetically modifying an increasing percentage of somatic cells in the general population. These new cells will produce spike proteins throughout their body triggering irreversible autoimmune disease across the planet.

Another more remote possibility is that this genetic modification will be passed on into the sex cells. The descendants would have this new genetic element in every single cell. Although the Spike protein on every cell would not be recognised as foreign, neither would the Spike proteins on the coronavirus, ensuring a growing population becoming more susceptible to severe infection.

The Oxford viral vector “vaccine” uses genetically-engineered adenoviral DNA that has enjoyed facilitated entry to the nucleus of the host cell and thus does not require RNA transcriptase. It is already dangerously close to the genetic architecture. All it would take is the enzyme called DNA integratase and you have a genetically-modified organism in every sense of the term.

We are all Rabbits

In a remotely sane world, it takes 5-10 years to develop a vaccine. To roll out this experiment on care home residents at warp speed is pure insanity. Despite the desperate attempts of the mainstream media to assure the general public that the compressed trials have been completed according to strict safety standards, a close look at the facts reveals the opposite. For example, the estimated end date for completion of the Oxford vaccine trials is February 21st 2023. Likewise, Pfizer and BioNTech have not concluded their phase three trials. They haven’t even fully completed phase one. They are running them all at the same time. The Pharma majors have simply skirted safety issues by first claiming their gene therapy to be a form of “vaccination” and secondly by making use of “emergency” regulations allowing unapproved drugs to be allowed on the market in emergencies. What little regulation they have done has been carried out by their cronies. This is malfeasance of the highest order.

They have swapped the sacrificial test animals for the elderly. The pressure will mount to include all adults in the experiment. Then no doubt they will manufacture some justification to apply the gene therapy to children.

Dr Doug Corrigan outlined the potential scenario back on August 1st 2020:

“A coronavirus vaccine may not be dangerous initially. If the initial testing looks positive, mass vaccination efforts would presumably be administered to a large portion of the population. In the first year or two, it may appear that there is no real safety issue, and over time, a greater percentage of the world population will be vaccinated due to this perceived “safety”. During this interim period, the virus is busy mutating. Eventually, the antibodies that vaccinated individuals have floating around in their bloodstream are now rendered non-neutralizing because they fail to bind to the virus with the same affinity due to the structural change resulting from the mutation. Declining concentrations of the antibody over time would also contribute to this shift towards non-neutralization.  When these previously vaccinate people are infected with this different strain of SARS-CoV-2, they could experience a much more severe reaction to the virus.”

Dr Corrigan also argues that vaccine-induced antibodies are more likely to become non-neutralizing (binding) antibodies than those that arise from people naturally infected with the virus.

“These types of vaccines will only elicit antibodies that recognize the portion of the virus which is present in the vaccine. The other portions of the virus are not represented in the antibody pool.”

“In a real infection, our immune system is exposed to every nook and cranny of the entire virus, and as such, our immune system develops a panacea of antibodies that recognize different portions of the virus and, therefore, coat more of the virus and neutralize it.”

Dr Dolores Cahill, molecular biologist/immunologist and specialist in the diagnosis of auto-immune diseases & cancer, predicted that there would be adverse events, serious anaphylactic reactions from the first dose (in around 2.5% of people) and second dose (perhaps 10%, even 80% for those over 80). Around 80% of the over-80’s receiving the vaccine would have life-limiting reactions or even death from the second dose.

Her predictions are bearing out so far. As reported by the UK column, after the onset of “vaccination”, death in the over-80’s seems to have multiplied 3-fold.

These unusual death events have been reported in care homes across the country since the beginning of the vaccine rollout. However, any connection to the “vaccine” is being denied and ascribed to the new variant of the coronavirus.

The official narrative does not hold up, as usual. Viruses mutate into new strains which infect more hosts but kill fewer of them. This is because a lethal parasite soon goes out of business. More lethal variants tend to lose out to less lethal ones. This is why some form of coronavirus accounts for around 30% of common colds and 10% of influenza-like illnesses.

The official response to these extra deaths is yet more “vaccination”. Staff in care homes and hospitals cannot even question yet alone resist these policies.

An anonymous care home manager reports to the UK column:

“Well from the reports that I’m seeing from my colleagues that the vaccines are very often accompanied by outbreaks, so I’ve seen quite a few colleagues reporting that they’ve (the care homes) been free from any illnesses over the 12 months, then the vaccines come in and then an outbreak results.”

If we look at overall excess deaths in England and Wales from the beginning of 2020 to wk4 of 2021, we see that there are 2 spikes.

The first spike resulted from the introduction of the lockdown and the catastrophic reorientation of heath care on a national level, as covered in part 1. The second, a couple of weeks after the onset of “vaccination” combined with the 3rd lockdown and its reintroduction of the failed measures.

The same pattern is occurring throughout the US and Europe. France, along with Germany and Austria, has now restricted the Oxford vaccine to the under-65s claiming lack of efficacy. The real reason is because people are starting to drop like flies. At the time of the article, 2nd February 2021, over 1.5 million people had received a Covid “vaccine” in France. In the UK, which has a similar population, more than 10 million doses had been given. The UK allegedly has the highest daily “Covid death” rate ever, coinciding with the world’s first roll-out of Covid gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine.

The small British Colony of Gibraltar suffered only 17 deaths out of 32,000 before the 9th January 2021. Spanish workers move freely in and out of Gibraltar quite freely, so this phenomenon cannot be ascribed to isolation. Since the 9th January, 36 more deaths occurred over a week. What happened? 6,000 Pfizer “vaccines” were flown in and swiftly injected into the vulnerable among the populace. The relationship is brutally clear, yet one can hear nothing but crickets from the media.

Switzerland has rejected the Oxford vaccine altogether.

The official narrative goes that a death is from Covid-19 because of a positive PCR test within 28 days, despite numerous co-morbidities or “vaccination”. Yet a death after “vaccination” with no positive test is because of the co-morbidities.

As Dr Mercola puts it:

“Now all of a sudden, old people dying shortly after vaccination are shrugged off with the excuse that they’re old and could have died any day anyway. Old people dying with SARS-CoV-2, however, must be stopped at any cost.”

We have yet to see the effects from the second dose play out. Dr Cahill warned that these would be more severe, particularly in the elderly.

However, her main prediction, in agreement with that of Dr Corrigan, Dr Judy Mikovits and numerous others, was that it would be after several months, a year, or several years that the truly adverse events would occur. They would be due to the immune super priming, the setting up of auto-immune disease and cytokine storms as outlined above. The mRNA in the body would express the viral protein, and the immune system would see antigens in the body’s own cells and organs and attack them. The binding antibodies induced will then enhance the entry of the wild virus and other common viruses into the cells and trigger further immunopathology. Those with co-morbidities would have exhausted cells and be unable to resist the onset of organ failure, sepsis and death. However, all is not lost for those who have already taken the gene therapy as we shall see.

It is imperative that this information gets out into the general population to prevent unnecessary deaths and suffering on a massive scale.

More than this, a great shift in awareness needs to occur if a free humanity is to survive and thrive. This will be the focus of part 5.

Tell ’em a hookah smoking caterpillar has given you the call

Update – March 20th 2021,

After twenty-one countries having suspended the Astrazeneca Covid “vaccines”, primarily due to issues with blood clotting, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Ireland are slowly resuming roll out.

“Germany, France, Italy and Spain said they would resume using the Oxford/AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine after the EU drugs regulator said there was a “clear scientific conclusion” that the jab was “safe and effective”.”

The mantras of “science”, “safe” and “effective” seem strained and already wearing thin in the context of the current meltdown. When taking into account that none of the safety trials have actually been completed yet nor have the vaccines been licensed, only emergency authorised, then these mantras take on decidedly Orwellian undertones.

Denmark, Norway and Sweden have not backed down to pharmaceutical pressure and are still on hold. Experts such as Norwegian Professor Pål Andre Holme have unequivocally linked serious blood clots with the administration of the Astrazeneca vaccine:

We have the reason. Nothing but the vaccine can explain why these individuals had this immune response. There is nothing in the patient history of these individuals that can give such a powerful immune response.

I am confident that the antibodies that we have found are the cause, and I see no other explanation than it being the vaccine which triggers it.

This follows the submission and following publication of a letter on March 10th to the EMA from the Doctors for COVID Ethics, expressing their concerns regarding all the experimental Covid vaccines:

  • The gene-vaccines are expected to reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body.
  • They will be taken up by endothelial cells lining the blood vessels.
  • The immune cells will mount an attack on these cells that have been induced to express spike proteins or fragments on their surfaces.
  • Endothelial damage will trigger inflammation and blood coagulation via platelet activation at countless sites throughout the body.
  • This will lead to a drop in platelet counts, elevation of D-dimers (markers for thrombosis), and myriad ischaemic lesions (damage due to disrupted blood flow) throughout the body, including the brain, spinal cord and heart.
  • The platelets themselves have ACE receptors which the spike protein binds to, leading to platelet activation and further risk of blood clotting. This has in fact been confirmed by the Norwegian experts:

Our theory that this is a powerful immune response which most likely was caused by the vaccine has been found. In collaboration with experts in the field from the University Hospital of North Norway HF, we have found specific antibodies against blood platelets that can cause these reactions, and which we know from other fields of medicine, but then with medical drugs as the cause of the reaction”, the chief physician explains to VG.

  • For all the above concerns, the doctors requested evidence that they were excluded in pre-clinical animal models prior to approval.
  • The doctors remain unconvinced that an actual emergency existed at the time of roll out, justifying such emergency approval for use in humans.

The doctors received no reply from the EMA and were therefore forced to make their letter public.

One of group’s most prominent members, renowned immunologist Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, represents their views  in this video statement.

Bhakdi highlights the above points and adds that countless people are part of an unprecedented live experiment without any liability on the part of the pharmaceutical interests that are carrying it out. .

He also notes that a wide range of adverse effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy, younger individuals and that reports of waves of deaths in care homes follow in the immediate wake of vaccination of the residents.

He further surmises, like Dolores Cahill, that the effect will be magnified following the second dose.

Finally, he suggests a challenge to the medical regulators to release the figures of the numbers of people who have died within 28 days of receiving a Covid vaccine. This would place the statistics on a level playing field with the purported impact of the virus itself.

In the UK, 26,853,407 people have received the 1st dose of a Covid vaccine and 2,132,551 have received a 2nd dose according to Public Health England.

One cannot fail to note the spike in the number of deaths following the roll out of initial doses of the vaccine. The third wave has seen more deaths per week than the first wave.

The Telegraph reports that more people are dying of Covid -19 now in Europe than in the first wave.

The spikes seem to be occurring in areas with high vaccination rates.


Matt Hancock was asked about the recording of deaths within 3 weeks of covid vaccination. His answer made it clear that this data is not being gathered.

Nurses report distinct symptoms following vaccination such as delirium, inability to walk, low heart rate, low temperature, cold peripheries, headaches, bio obstruction, incontinence, low platelet counts, extensive rashes being treated with no attempt to connect to the known side effects of the vaccines or recorded on the Yellow Card system. Nowhere on the paperwork is there a section to record the vaccine status of the patient. Important information is being ignored or even concealed.

A second spike in deaths following the 2nd dose will confirm the vaccine’s role.

The pioneer in immunology,  Charles Richet noted in his Nobel lecture on Anaphylaxis in 1913 that once sensitized to a foreign body, the immune system overreacts when exposed to it a second time and that the longer you wait past around 3 weeks, the worse it seems to get, then you become sensitized, even to substances that aren’t toxic. The UK imposed delay on the 2nd Pfizer jab may have the result of maximizing the effect of anaphylaxis.

Here are some relevant excerpts from Richet’s lecture:

Now I have shown that there is a third possibility, frequently to be observed in certain conditions which I have specified: this is of heightened sensitivity. The first injection, instead of protecting the organism, renders it more fragile and more susceptible. This is anaphylaxis.”

In 1903 Arthus, in Lausanne, showed that a first intravenous injection of serum on a rabbit causes anaphylaxis, i.e. three weeks after the first injection the rabbit is hypersensitive to the second injection. The phenomenon of anaphylaxis was becoming of general application. Instead of applying only to toxins and toxalbumins, it held good for all proteins, whether toxic at the first injection or not.

Two years later Rosenau and Anderson, two American physiologists, demonstrated in a noteworthy piece of work that the phenomenon of anaphylaxis occurs after every injection of serum, even when the injection is minute, for example of 0.00001 ml which is an infinitely small amount but nevertheless sufficient to anaphylactize an animal. They quoted examples of anaphylaxis from all organic liquids: milk, serum, egg, muscle extract.

Anaphylaxis takes place also in human subjects and has caused death in certain instances. It is indeed probable that sudden death following the bursting of a hydatid cyst is an anaphylactic phenomenon. Some years back I was in Brazil and I heard the story of a doctor who had given himself a preventive injection of anti-plague serum. The next year a new outbreak of plague was feared so he persuaded his students to have a preventive injection of the same serum. He set the example by giving himself another one. This was however an unleashing injection and his body had been affected by the first. The second injection was fatal and within two hours he was dead.

On top of all this we have yet to see the carnage that may ensue in the coming months and years due to the ADE effects of the “vaccines” outlined above.

Update – May 8th 2021

Official Deaths & Adverse Events due to the Covid Vaccine

In the UK, as of May 7th:

  • 16,764,720 people have received the second dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
  • Bringing the total vaccinated to 51,834,361

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) report through the UK Government’s system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions:

1,047 deaths and 725,079 injuries following COVID19 experimental “vaccines” in the U.K.

685 of the 1,047 deaths followed AstraZeneca COVID injections, and 573,650 of the 725,079 injuries followed AstraZeneca COVID injections

The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through April 21, 2021, for the three experimental COVID “vaccines” currently in use in the U.K. from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna.

1,047 Dead 725,079 Reported Injuries following COVID19 Experimental “Vaccines” Reported in the U.K.

“‘Rare adverse events are defined as those occurring in 1/1000 to 1/10,000 patients”

Thus 0.1% – 0.01%  of a vaccinated population experiencing adverse events is considered rare.

The UK currently works out as having 1.39% of the Covid vaccinated population experiencing adverse events. This is using official MHRA figures.

Covid vaccine adverse events are therefore not rare, even considering the under-reported nature of vaccine adverse events.

In Europe:

As of April 17, 2021:

7,766 deaths and 330,218 injuries in reaction to the COVID-19 “vaccines”

Norway and Denmark have now banned the AstraZeneca “vaccine” due to the higher risk of injury and death than with the COVID-19 virus.

Other European countries are currently maintaining their temporary suspension of the AZ shots.

Not the UK though, which predictably, has never halted the roll out of their flagship “vaccine”.

They are recommending however, that those under-40 should receive a different “vaccine”, unless different “vaccines” are not available, in which case they recommend the AZ “vaccine” after all.

I know!

In the US

From the 4/30/2021 release of VAERS data:

3,837 cases where Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and patient died


(Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)

More information on the progress of adverse events and deaths can be found on the website of the indefatigable Dr Vernon Coleman.

How Many People Are The Covid Vaccines Killing?

And now the UK Column have taken it upon themselves to shed light on the obscure reporting of the Yellow Card system on the part of the MHRA.

COVID-19 Vaccine Analysis Overview

Disingenuous Fact-Checkers

Recently, the various reporting systems themselves have come under fire from the so-called Factcheckers who are now desperately claiming that anyone is allowed to make a report, somehow invalidating the very systems set up by official bodies around the world. Rather ironic then, that it is the official narrative of such bodies that the so-called Factcheckers presume to defend.

However, it is clear that systems require key information such as where the vaccination was received, what the batch number was, attending physicians etc. This excludes people that have not had the vaccine. The MHRA, for example spent vast sums on its artificial intelligence recording system to ensure no errors, in anticipation of a flood of adverse events.

Moreover, it has long been established that biases in the various reporting systems veer in the exact opposite direction. For example, experts admit that the US VAERS system suffers from such a problem, where a mere 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

Lazarus et al, ‘Electronic Support for Public Health – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, Results

This bias in the data resulting from underreporting of adverse events is likely to occur elsewhere in other systems as well.

Indeed, The MHRA itself claims that only 10% of serious adverse reactions are reported:

“But all spontaneous reporting schemes have a problem with numbers: the MHRA itself says that only 10% of serious reactions and 2–4% of all reactions are reported using the Yellow Card Scheme. This means that most iatrogenic morbidity goes unreported. It’s not as if adverse reactions are unusual.”

This was the case before 2020. It is logical to assume that such biases are likely to be amplified in the hysterical atmosphere that the world now finds itself in.

Another whistleblowing NHS professional, sitting on an NHS Board, claimed in an interview with Brian Gerrish of the UK column that:

“I know that the Yellow Card reporting system is not reflective of the amount of adverse events that are actually happening, and I’ll give you an example of that. I know of a patient who reported their extreme adverse-event side effect to a nurse, and that nurse did not report it to the Yellow Card reporting system.”

The point is also made that even with the under-reported official figures, it would not be acceptable for this number of people to die from  any other form of medication in history:

Now, even if you take into account that the reporting isn’t accurate, when we think about any other drug in history that has gone through the NHS, it would not be acceptable for that many people to die, full stop. And yet, in this circumstance, for some reason, it is acceptable.”

Yet the figures are most likely under-reported to such a degree that they fall far short of their true scope.

Covax Correlations

Such a scope can be gleaned from the deeply concerning  correlation between the rollout of vaccinations and increased mortality, particularly that hurriedly ascribed to Covid-19.

Even the most ardent coincidence theorists must struggle to not be perturbed by even a cursory glance at such correlations.

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, representing the Doctors for Covid Ethics, noted early that reports of waves of deaths in care homes followed in the immediate wake of vaccination of the residents.

John Waters reports on the ominous and plausible a connection between the surge in mortality in 60 Irish nursing homes and the vaccination rollout beginning in mid-January.

A chart of unexpected deaths following 8 weeks post start of vaccinations throughout Europe reveals the same pattern:

The US states of California, Florida and Texas show a similar surge in deaths following vaccination rollout:

In India, where all the attention has been of late, the vaccine rollout follows the pattern:

In Mongolia, where was an average of 0 deaths as of 23rd February, a surge followed shortly after vaccine roll out:

These were a few examples of such disturbing correlations, there are many more to be seen in this video, while it lasts:

Impact of COVID Vaccinations on Mortality

Iain Davis writing for the UK column outlines the case in the UK:

Why Is There A Correlation Between The Vaccine Rollout And Increased COVID–19 Mortality?

“By 19 January, the Care Quality Commission were reporting a 46% jump in COVID–19 care home deaths in England. They said the increase in cases was in line with the community spread of infection. They didn’t mention that it was also in line with the community spread of vaccines.”

Covid-related deaths in care homes in England jump by 46%

Mortality in the over-80’s particularly reveals the correlation:

As we know, the definition of a COVID–19 death in the UK is death from any cause where COVID–19 was mentioned on the death certificate within 28 days or even 60 days of a positive test. This is despite comorbidities being present in the vast majority of such deaths.

However, deaths within 28 days of Covid “vaccination” does not qualify as a vaccine death. Recall the challenge issued by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi to the medical regulators to release the figures of the numbers of people who have died within 28 days of receiving a Covid vaccine, placing the statistics on a level playing field with the purported impact of the virus itself.

Such data would be conclusive, yet curiously, it is currently impossible to obtain such data anywhere. This vaccine data-shaped hole alone is significant in itself.

Until such time as this data becomes available, one must continue to look at the correlations between vaccination and deaths ascribed to covid-19, comparing with before vaccination.

A paper originally hosted on the Doctors for Covid Ethics Medium account has been removed by the platform.

It is archived however, and OffGuardian have posted it here

In the paper, the group streamline their message to three main points.

The vaccines are:

  • Unnecessary
  • Ineffective
  • Unsafe

The first two points will be covered in the updates for parts 2 & 3.

Here we will focus on the safety aspect.

All gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders based on their molecular mechanisms of action. This has led to suspensions around the world.

These disorders are not “rare”, many indicating thrombosis and other severe abnormalities.

As we have seen, the UK has 1.39% of the Covid vaccinated population having experienced adverse events using official MHRA figures. To be considered rare, adverse events have to be within a 0.1 to 0.01 % range.

Considering the under-reported nature of vaccine adverse events, only 10% in the UK and the strong likelihood that many of the adverse effects can lead to misdiagnosis as Covid-19. For example, vaccine-induced diffuse micro-thromboses in the lungs can mimic pneumonia.

“Clotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the ‘tip of a huge iceberg’”

The risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events are expected to increase with each subsequent dose.

The vaccinations may lead to immunosuppression in addition to anaphylaxis and ADE. This may have caused previously asymptomatic infections to become clinically manifest as observed in the waves of deaths in care homes following vaccination.

The “vaccines” remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Long term safety measures have gone by the wayside.

The previous Phase 1 and 2 trials have been carried out in an extremely dubious fashion. Limited animal trials were only carried out simultaneously with Phase 1 trials. According to the journal Vaccine, despite  initially large sample sizes:

 “the vaccination strategy chosen for further development may have only been given to as few as 12 participants”

The Doctors for Covid Ethics note:

“With such extremely small sample sizes, the journal notes that, “larger Phase 3 studies conducted over longer periods of time will be necessary” to establish safety. The risks that remain to be evaluated in Phase 3 trials into 2023, with entire populations as subjects, include not only thrombosis and bleeding abnormalities, but other autoimmune responses, allergic reactions, unknown tropisms (tissue destinations) of lipid nanoparticles[35], antibody-dependent enhancement [43-46] and the impact of rushed, questionably executed, poorly regulated[47] and reportedly inconsistent manufacturing methods, conferring risks of potentially harmful impurities such as uncontrolled DNA residues[48]. The vaccines are not safe, either for recipients or for those who administer them or authorise their use.”

The Lone Spike Theory

An article written by Dr Mike Williams for the UK column reinforces these concerns and even takes them further.

The three main areas that are currently receiving attention in the media are:

  • Clotting disorders
  • Abnormal menses
  • Shedding of vaccine material – spike proteins

Dr Williams focuses on the first area in this article, leaving the second and third for later articles.

Clotting disorders

Two related problems, the first leading to the second.

  1. Thrombosis forming a clot  blocking a vessel supplying blood to an organ
  2. Thrombocytopenia reducing platelet numbers (having been exhausted in clot formation) needed to prevent bleeding elsewhere.

Dr Williams notes that awareness of such problems extends back in the scientific literature as far back as 2007.

The causal factor of such problems was frequently identified as the spike protein, the very same spike protein that the majority of the covid vaccines induce the host’s cells to manufacture and express. Again and again it has been observed that spike proteins, categorised as “pseudovirions”, even absent from viral RNA, can dock onto ACE2 receptors in endothelial cells lining the blood vessels, setting up cytokine storms and disrupting supply to the organs, including the brain. These resistant clots can thus lead to severe damage to the blood brain barrier.

Importantly, Dr Williams also points out the narrative that the virus poses a greater risk of clotting than the vaccination ignores the true risk/reward calculation. This requires it be multiplied by the risk of actually being diagnosed (officially) with Covid. Then even the official risk is much higher for those vaccinated.

He concludes:

“Simply put, there is overwhelming evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (that is also synthetically produced by the Covid vaccines) is a central part of the mechanisms of morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2, and therefore is also a risk of the vaccine. In regard to clotting, that risk is greater if you receive a vaccine.

The data clearly demonstrate that the last thing you would ever want to do is make a vaccine that produces a spike protein. As the literature clearly showed, it would cause significant damage, including brain clots and death. And that literature, for the most part, was available before the release of Covid vaccines to the public.”

Update – September 18th

Official Deaths & Adverse Events due to the Covid Vaccine

In the UK, as of September 17th

  • 48,528,901 people (89% of the population aged 16 and over) have received the first dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
  • 44,298,076 people (81% of the population aged 16 and over) have received the second dose of the COVID-19 “vaccine”
  • Bringing the total vaccinated to 92,826,977

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) report through the UK Government’s system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions:

1,625 deaths and 1,186,837 injuries following COVID19 experimental “vaccines” in the U.K.

Rare adverse events are defined as those occurring in 1/1000 to 1/10,000 patients

Thus 0.1% – 0.01%  of a vaccinated population experiencing adverse events is considered rare.

The UK currently works out as having 1.28% of the Covid vaccinated population experiencing adverse events. This is using official MHRA figures.

Covid vaccine adverse events are therefore not rare, even without considering the under-reported nature of vaccine adverse events.

The MHRA itself claims that only 10% of serious adverse reactions are reported:

But all spontaneous reporting schemes have a problem with numbers: the MHRA itself says that only 10% of serious reactions and 2–4% of all reactions are reported using the Yellow Card Scheme. This means that most iatrogenic morbidity goes unreported. It’s not as if adverse reactions are unusual.”

This was the case before 2020. It is logical to assume that such biases are likely to be amplified in the hysterical atmosphere that the world now finds itself in.

This means that the number of serious adverse events in the UK could be higher than 10,178,06910.28% of the vaccinated population. The real number of deaths attributed to the vaccine could be higher than 10,612 – 0.01% of the vaccinated population.

Dr Dolores Cahill, molecular biologist/immunologist and specialist in the diagnosis of auto-immune diseases & cancer, predicted that there would be adverse events, serious anaphylactic reactions from the first dose (in around 2.5% of people) and second dose (perhaps 10%, even 80% for those over 80). Around 80% of the over-80’s receiving the vaccine would have life-limiting reactions or even death from the second dose.

Taking into account the under-reported nature of serious vaccine adverse events admitted by the MHRA, we see that a realistic estimate – 10.28% or over is in line with Dr Cahill’s prediction of 10% from those receiving the second dose.

In the EU:

More than 70% of the European Union’s adult population has been fully vaccinated which is about 265 million.

As of September 03rd , 2021:

23,252 deaths and 2,189,537 injuries in reaction to the COVID-19 “vaccines”

A realistic estimate of EU Covid vaccine injuries would be in the region of  21,189,537 injuries (8.3% of the vaccinated population)  and 232,520 deaths (0.09% of the vaccinated population).

These estimates are slightly short of Dr Cahill’s predictions.

In the US:

As of 12th September 2021:

Official estimates of US vaccination claim 178 million of the population have been “fully” vaccinated which is 54.2%.

From the 3/09/2021 release of VAERS data:

13,911 deaths and 2,993,377 injuries following COVID19 experimental “vaccines” in the US.


(Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)

Experts admit that the US VAERS system suffers from far worse under-reporting compared to the UK system, with a mere 1% of vaccine adverse events being reported.

Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.

Lazarus et al, ‘Electronic Support for Public Health – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, Results

A realistic estimate of US Covid vaccine injuries would be in the region of at least 29,933,770 injuries (16.8% of the vaccinated population)  and 139,111 deaths (0.08% of the vaccinated population).

These estimates surpass Dr Cahill’s predictions as to the earlier effects.

Dr Cahill’s main prediction was that it would be after several months, a year, or several years that the truly adverse events would occur. They would be due to the immune super priming, the setting up of auto-immune disease and cytokine storms as outlined above in this article. The mRNA in the body would express the viral protein, and the immune system would see antigens in the body’s own cells and organs and attack them. The binding antibodies induced would then enhance the entry of the wild virus and other common viruses into the cells and trigger further immunopathology. Those with co-morbidities would have exhausted cells and be unable to resist the onset of organ failure, sepsis, and death.

Nobel prize winner, Professor Luc A Montagnier claimed in April 2020 that he believed the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory and escaped as a rogue viral vector vaccine. In May 2021 he he stated:

Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants”.

In Australia, the prison colony, the government has completely gone insane and has lost all control.

This graph reveals why:

Observe the excess deaths,  with no Covid 19 deaths to take the blame. Lockdown policies from Nov 2020 onward and following the vaccine rollout in Feb 2021, excess non-Covid deaths skyrocket. All these deaths were predominantly attributed to cancer, dementia and “other” causes.

Australian Bureau of Statistics – Provisional Mortality Statistics

The UK column reports on yet another curious anomaly regarding vaccine roll outs and waves of Covid-19 infections.

It can be seen that all the way from Jan 01st 2020 , through the Covid “pandemic” up to March 31st 2021, there were minimal cases and deaths attributed to Covid-19.

Focusing on the cases, Mike Robinson of the UK column notes that at the end of March 2021, the cases begin ramping up, with deaths correlating closely. Towards the end of June the rate accelerates. Mike then notes that curiously, Thailand began rolling out its vaccination program in a limited fashion at the beginning of March. From June, mass-vaccination was underway.

Coincidence theorists, look upon this graph and despair!

As we have noted previously such correlations between vaccination and deaths ascribed to Covid-19, compared  with before vaccination, crop up everywhere around the world.

Widening the Gaze Beyond Delta

We have been forced to look at such correlations because we haven’t had the data available to us that would enable us to draw solid conclusions.

The definition of a COVID–19 death in the UK is death from any cause where COVID–19 was mentioned on the death certificate within 28 days or even 60 days of a positive test. This is despite comorbidities being present in the vast majority of such deaths. The PCR test is commonly run at 40 cycles and over, yielding a 97% false positive rate. The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, state that anything found over 20 cycles was meaningless as diagnosis. Even Anthony Fauci stated that over 35 cycles was – “dead nucleotides, period.”

However, data on deaths within 28 days, or 60 days, of a Covid “vaccination” does not qualify as a vaccine death. Such data would be conclusive, yet curiously, it is has been impossible to obtain such data anywhere.

As noted by Dr Vernon Coleman:

“Finally, if your government really cared about you, they would conduct a very simple, cheap trial.

They would keep a note of all the health problems affecting 20,000 patients who had the vaccine and compare that list with a list of all the health problems affecting 20,000 patients who didn’t have the vaccine in the same period. They make the comparisons every 3, 6 and 12 months.

Of course, they’d have to find some honest doctors to oversee the trial because it would be very easy to fiddle.

But it would give some very interesting results so I doubt if they’ll be doing it.”

MP Sir Christopher Chope asked the Secretary of State, on the 7th July, what information his department holds on the number of deaths that have been reported of people who have died within one month, two months, 3 months of having received a Covid 19 vaccination since the first of January. Chope reported to parliament that:

he said data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within one month, two months, 3 months of having received a Covid 19 vaccination since the first of January is not available in the format requested. Public Health England monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from Covid 19 who have received one or two doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course. That data has not yet been published.”

Well, it has now.

On the 13th September, the ONS released:

Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 January and 2 July 2021

This twitter user compiled a graph representing the information on the ONS pertaining to total deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated and Covid 19 deaths related deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated.

Here is the graph along with another a graph on excess mortality in the UK underneath for comparison:

On the first graph we see during the weeks of winter, that there is a significantly greater number of total deaths in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.  This trend continues and is more pronounced in the period up to July as overall deaths decline due to the roll out of spring and summer.

This gives the lie to the effectiveness of the vaccine as the talking heads disingenuously stated that most cases in the hospital for this period were unvaccinated. Most of the population had been unvaccinated at this time and of course this would be the case. The lie fails to hide the deaths due to vaccination however.

Note how keeping all eyes on delta, makes it appear that there is little difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. As we shall see, this is due to the distorted testing protocols for covid 19 heavily weighted against unvaccinated patients and the use of the fraudulent 40+ PCR cycle thresholds.

Week 18 corresponds with the date of April 15th where  >50% of adults have received the first dose.

At this point we see total unvaccinated deaths at 4 per 100,000

And total vaccinated deaths at 27 per 100,000

Therefore, there is a  675% difference in vaccinated deaths versus unvaccinated deaths when just over 50% of population had received the first dose.

As autumn and winter encroach, we await with trepidation the ONS data for the 2nd half of the year.

Sir Christopher Chope also reported on the comparison between this “vaccine” roll out and all other vaccine roll outs in history.

“I think it’s very important, because there’s a lot more damage being done to our citizens as a result of Covid-19 vaccinations than in any other vaccination program in history.”

This is certainly borne out by US Data:

The Covid “vaccine” (~ 200M doses and 13,627 deaths) has been 30 times more lethal than the influenza vaccine (vaccine ~ 900M doses and 1,951 deaths).

Consider that the roll out of the Swine Flu vaccine was halted after 47 deaths….

From mid-July 2021, the pharmaceutically compromised government and media conglomerates around the world began seeding the false notion that the latest “pandemic” was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”.  

It is claimed that “cases”, hospitalizations, and deaths have shot up, primarily amongst the vaccinated.

On September 09th the Biden administration announced that all federal employees were required to receive a COVID-19 vaccination as a condition for employment. The fallacious argument was made that the hospitals were over 90% full of unvaccinated people.

This campaign has the single purpose of pressuring more people to receive the gene-editing technology masquerading as a “vaccine.”

In fact, the exact opposite is happening, not only in the US but around the world. The hospitals are full of vaccinated patients, those who have survived that is. Many healthcare workers have stated that there is pressure from doctors and hospital administrations to not relate injuries to the COVID-19 vaccinations and to not report them on the official databases.

First of all, we know that “cases” are, in the vast majority, unrelated to those with symptoms but are based on the fraudulent PCR test run at 40 cycles or above, with a 97% false positive rate.

In the UK, we can compare the % increase in testing this year with last year:

10-19 year-olds have been tested 344% more frequently this year than last year. Also note the differences in the numbers tested between those under 60 and those over 60. This should go a long way towards clearing up the fallacy that young people are somehow more susceptible to the delta variant.

The true extent of the threat posed by the delta variant has been exposed on Twitter by Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor.


None of this should be surprising given that deaths have always declined over the spring and the summer, year in, year out, “vaccine” roll out or not.

Now, what about the claim that increases in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are primarily among the unvaccinated?

We know that thousands of people vaccinated with two doses are still testing positive for COVID, as they are called “breakthrough” cases.

We also know that in the US, the CDC decided to stop counting “breakthrough cases.” From May 01st 2021 onward.

We know that a doctor reported to Katy Grimes of the California Globe that hospitals are being instructed to NOT test those who are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 when they are admitted.

“A physician contacted the Globe and said testing protocol from Scripps is indicating that they aren’t testing the vaccinated in the hospitals – they are only testing the unvaccinated for COVID (see below), despite the many COVID breakthrough cases reported.

The physician asked, “I wonder if this is the new testing protocol state wide?”

The physician contacted another hospital and reported to the Globe:

“They HAVE NOT been testing the vaccinated for COVID routinely like they have the unvaccinated, but they JUST changed their policy to begin doing this.” Unbelievable! So, all this BS in the newspapers has been spewing about the vaccinated NOT having COVID BECAUSE THEY DON’T TEST FOR IT!”

Vaccinated patients are not being routinely tested as are unvaccinated patients. Therefore, with a PCR test of 40 cycles and above yielding a 97% false positive rate, there will be far more unvaccinated in the original samples before determining and comparing cases and deaths amongst the two cohorts.

Schools, universities, and many businesses are adopting the same policies – frequent testing of the unvaccinated and NO testing of the vaccinated. It’s cooking the books and most people don’t realize that.  Even the NFL is going along with it, as the testing protocols for the New England Patriots attest:

This fraud is most likely being carried out across the world, including the UK.

In all the cherry-picked studies they never disclose the proportions of those vaccinated versus unvaccinated in the original test sample BEFORE obtaining positive or negative results.

This is crucial data. Let’s say they sample 100,000 people. If 90,000 of those samples are unvaccinated and 10,000 vaccinated there is going to be a huge distortion in the statistics.

They never state that they tested x number of vaccinated people to get y number of positives in vaccinated people and x number of unvaccinated people to get y number of positives in unvaccinated people. y/x for vaccinated versus y/x unvaccinated is all important here but they only look at y vaccinated versus y unvaccinated.

Most heinous of all, the official bodies are also counting vaccinated people who get ill within 14 days as unvaccinated. Those vaccinated admitted to hospital within that time frame will be tested and, if positive (very likely at 40+ cycles), will be counted as unvaccinated delta cases/deaths, simultaneously reducing the number of vaccinated delta cases/deaths.

This was discovered by Dr Simone Gold, founder of America’s Frontline Doctors.

“The CDC is now listing vaccinated COVID-19 deaths as UNvaccinated deaths if they die within 14 days of the vaccine.”

This means there will be far greater numbers of vaccinated people in the intensive care wards who haven’t been tested or have been tested at lower PCR rates. Among these are the ones that die from the “short illness“. But they never show up because all eyes are on delta.

That is unprecedented fraud. And it won’t get onto MHRA VAERS, etc.

More than fraud.

Murder One…

On the Sept 8th Stew Peters Show Stew interviewed an anonymous nurse whistle-blower working in a US hospital and ICU.

Nurse “The overflow we have had, mostly, since the vaccination roll out, where we’ve had patients, periods of time where we’ve had overflow into the emergency rooms that it was not covid specifically.”

Nurse “They get PCR test and if they are negative, they are put on the main floor. If they are positive, they typically go to straight to the isolation covid ICU, depending on the level of symptoms, so its all basically based on that one particular test.”

Nurse “Everyone takes that test as gospel so if you get a positive test, no matter what your symptoms, even asymptomatic, you are already on Covid track, going to the area where isolated gown, gloves, your level of care is completely different.”

Nurse “It doesn’t matter if you have respiratory symptoms or not, that’s the thing.”

Stew Peters “And of those patients that go on Remdesivir and ventilators, do the majority of them die or do the majority of them survive and recover?”

Nurse “Most of them do not do well, a lot of them do pass away. Remdesivir itself has caused kidney issues, heart issues. Patients typically do not do well.”

Stew Peters “So, the things that have been reported on this program are that Remdesivir was a dangerous drug, Anthony Fauci knew that, the CDC, the NIH, those that are dictating protocol to hospitals are very aware that Remdesivir causes kidney issues, sends fluid to the lungs, the ventilator then explodes the lungs, people are drowning, essentially, and you have seen this first hand?”

Nurse “Yes, absolutely. This has been the standard medication since the beginning. Over the summer, there was a period…originally it was all Remdesivir, there was a period over the summer, actually, when Covid numbers were low and almost gone, where Remdesivir was combined with Ivermectin. Now that is phasing out and is going back to completely just Remdesivir by itself.”

Stew Peters “In your hospital is there a test for the delta variant?”

Nurse “Absolutely not and in fact there is no mention of the word or mention of the word delta variant in any note from any doctor, from any outside office feeding in, urgent care, emergency room, I have not seen the word delta variant in any chart.”

Nurse “It’s all termed Covid-19. There is no test for the delta variant that I’m aware of.”

Nurse “The most influx I have seen is since the vaccination roll out and it’s more vaccination-related injuries, blood clots, cardiac issues, neurological issues, balance issues, cognitive issues, aggressive behaviour, encephalopathy, things like that were, that are very different from the previous Covid.”

Stew Peters “Do the doctors, do the providers, report these adverse events, these vaccine injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event reporting system?”

Nurse “I have not seen one incidence where they have. In fact when staff approaches doctors about this, whether its noticed by the staff or noticed by the patient’s family, they are completely dismissed. I have not had one doctor acknowledge anything I have said when a patient’s family or I have noticed that it’s been around the time of vaccination, we are completely dismissed.”

Stew Peters “So what you articulate that the cases being labelled Covid-19, and then by the media translated into new delta surge, that those patients are actually patients that are presenting with symptoms from this vaccine, these shots?”

Nurse “Absolutely. The staff that’s aware, cause now you know which staff is aware of what’s going on or acknowledging it, and which staff doesn’t, it’s almost, we almost label it the delta variant is the vaccine injuries. That’s what it is.”

Stew Peters “How many people that you work with, would you guess, percentage wise, are going to refuse this shot?”

Nurse “So far about 50%.”


Regarding Ivermectin, there have been unconfirmed reports of Australian hospitals using it only for vaccinated patients, in spite of banning it for early treatment.

As one comment pointed out:

“1. the unvaxed are receiving inferior treatment

2. they get coerced into being vaxed BUT if they die it gets recorded as unvaxed death – if they recover it’s recorded as vaxed recovery”.

Dead Letter

On September 13th2021, the Doctors for Covid Ethics sent a letter of Notice of Liability for harm and death from COVID-19 vaccines to all members of the European Parliament, the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

In March 2021, they had previously alerted the EMA to the potential  life-threatening thromboembolic events resulting from the vaccine roll out and urged suspension of the program.

In this latest letter they confirm and extend their original fears in an appended document.

“The COVID-19 vaccine technology’s interaction with the immune system creates the following four

specific problems:

1. Flying under the immune system’s radar with the vaccine’s genetic code

2. Delivering the spike protein into the bloodstream

3. Inducing immune attack on the blood vessel lining4. Enhancing the severity of natural infection”

“The crucial difference between a conventional live virus vaccine and a gene-based COVID vaccine—and in particular an mRNA vaccine—is that the latter contains no protein antigens whatsoever; instead, it only contains the blueprint for their synthesis inside the infected cells. Therefore, if such a vaccine is injected into a person with antibodies and existing T-cell immunity, the vaccine particles will “fly under the radar” of the antibody defence and reach our body cells unimpeded. The cells will then produce the spike protein, and subsequently be destroyed and attacked by the killer T-cells. The antibodies, rather than preventing the carnage, will join in by also binding to the cell-associated spike protein and directing the complement system (see later) and other immune effector mechanisms against these cells. In a nutshell, pre-existing immunity mitigates the risk of conventional vaccines, but it amplifies the risk of gene-based vaccines.

Importantly, before COVID, this risky gene-based vaccine technology had never before been used on a wide scale against infectious disease and is inherently experimental. The COVID-19 vaccination program is thus the largest human experiment ever performed in history.

Taking Out the Radar

It seems that the vaccine particles “fly under the radar” of the innate immune system as well the adaptive immune system. In fact, they may even be switching it off.

Dr Mike Williams, writing for the UK column, outlines the potential consequences of the technology employed to protect the mRNA within the Covid vaccines from the body’s immune system.

This involves the suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors on cells – the alarm signal of the Innate Immune System.

Researchers developed a means to modify the RNA code, namely the nucleoside uridine. This enabled the foreign vaccine mRNA to enter cells without being destroyed.

The innate immune system is the first to go into action against foreign invaders, including foreign mRNA from a vaccine. The concern raised by Dr Williams is that switching off this early warning system may have downstream effects such as inhibition of the CD8 T cell response. These cells are play an important role in the eradication of infection and cancer.

This potential link may explain the reports of patients with worsening cancer following Covid vaccination. These include reports of swollen lymph node in breasts, dramatic upticks in endometrial cancer, and vaccinated cancer patients coming out of remission with the cancer jumping between organs and spreading at unprecedented speeds.

These reports need to be substantiated, obscured as they may be, by the expected increase in morbidity and mortality as a result of lockdown and limited medical access.

Stabilising the Code

Unholy blood

Analyzing the blood of her vaccinated patients, German doctor, Dr Barbel Ghitalla, made a horrific discovery. She shared her findings with colleague Dr. Axel Bolland, and two lawyers.

“I’ve never seen anything like it. I’m afraid for my patients.”

She found that the red blood cells (RBC) had acquired a positive charge causing them to “stack” upon each other. This is one of the signs of blood cancer, termed ‘rouleaux’ formations. RBC normally have a negative charge, repelling each other so they maintain a healthy distance. The vaccinations are changing the electron charges to positive. Dr Gitala and her colleagues believe this  represents the beginning of thrombotic activity.

VAXXED Patients’ Blood Examined, Horrific Findings Revealed by German Physicians!

Dr Ghitalla also observed coiled pieces with a metallic sheen, which do not absorb light as the RBC do. She also obtained a Johnson and Johnson vaccine vial in which she found rigid structures with small white dots in between as shown below:

Other physicians, such as Dr Philippe van Welbergen in France have found the same severe ‘rouleaux’ formations in the blood samples they have taken. He also noted unusual tube-like structures.

His patients had all received the Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccinations and had been suffering from chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even paralysis, and late onset of heavy menstruation in women over 60.

“These strands or tubes appear to be hollow – it’s really odd. When you really expand it you can see some cells in it but we don’t know if it’s a crystalline structure or organic. The few healthy cells are circled. The rest are cracked and fractured – they’re finished. That’s not healthy blood. We see it again and again.”

“Healthy blood shows cells able to move around separately; they have good motility and will not cause thrombosis”

According to Dr Welbergen, local health authorities are refusing to accept that any side effects are vaccine damage.

But that’s rubbish – you hardly see any healthy cells here. We’re seeing other, even crazier things – the medical conference in Holland showed blue or red Morgellon-type structures that were travelling through those tubes.”

Dr Jane Ruby on the Stew Peters show 15th Sept 2021:

ADE is actually, it’s disease enhancement, …., these shots cannot protect you, they are actually enhancing, they’re creating a situation with the antibodies that will enhance viral replication.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement is the bioweapon, and the way you get there is to prime, and to  continually push the boosters

SHOCKING! Vaccine Injuries ALARMING as Antibody Dependent Enhancement EXPLODES! Doctors Being THREATENED, Forced to LIE! Milley TREASON, and Weaponized IRS

Let us close for now  with Dr Ryan Cole at the White Coat summit:

“This is what we need to emphasize to society, and ask the authoritative agencies:

What’s the risk for cancer after the shot?

We don’t know.

What’s the risk for autoimmune disease?

We don’t know.

What’s the risk for impairing fertility for a lifetime?

We don’t know.

So why in the world will we willy nilly push forward at the pace and the rate that we are going, without knowing these things?”


For if one drinks much from a bottle marked poison, it is almost certain to disagree with one sooner or later.

Alice In Wonderland

Next part 5

One pill makes you larger, and one pill makes you small

And the ones that mother gives you, don’t do anything at all

Go ask Alice, when she’s ten feet tall

And if you go chasing rabbits, and you know you’re going to fall

Tell ’em a hookah smoking caterpillar has given you the call

Call Alice, when she was just small

When the men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go

And you’ve just had some kind of mushroom, and your mind is moving low

13 thoughts on “COVAX through the Looking Glass part 4

  1. Hello,

    I know I may be missing something, but in the first part of this article you stated, “In an experiment in 2017, New Zealand white rabbits were inoculated with a zoonotic coronavirus – MERS-Cov. The rabbits became sick and developed antibodies, the measure of success for a vaccine.” The article followed with information, which upon reading, I felt I had missed something in the first paragraph. I have read it over multiple times, and still can not find what I might have missed. Did you mean to say the rabbits had at one point been vaccinated?

    Also, I love your writing style. I have been looking at some of the same information presented here, and I found your interpretation to be extremely clear… except for the point above, and another one.

    The other one… are you perhaps interpolating “binding” and “non-binding” antibodies?

    I know nowadays any kind of discord can look like a dissociation, such that a person commenting can be interpreted as being a jerk. However, I am REALLY interested.

    Thank you for your time and analysis,


    1. Hello Robin,
      Thanks for your kind words and questions.
      Yes, inoculation is the act of introducing a vaccine into a person’s (or a rabbit’s) body. The rabbits were subjects in a research program for a coronavirus vaccine.
      Perhaps I should have made the link to the paper more evident.
      “The other one… are you perhaps interpolating “binding” and “non-binding” antibodies?”
      The term “binding” antibodies does not refer to their ability to neutralize a virus but rather how when forming a complex with certain cell receptors, they facilitate virus entry rather than prevent it. An alternative term is non-neutralizing antibody but I believe this is something more than an antibody not quite doing its job efficiently.
      Again, I very much appreciate your comments and interest.


  2. Also in the graphic you provided and gave attribution to UK Column News – 10th February 2021. The note placed on the roughly first weeks of March/end of February deaths, most likely were not due to lockdown. I believe the excess mortality was due to early mitigation efforts — the totally unwarranted use of ventilators as a first response in protocol, along with the unusually high ventilator settings (again protocol under WHO recommendations); the totally bizarre DNR order issued by governance (Cuomo in the US, not sure if it happened in England); and the strange orders in regard to nursing homes (again as seen in NY in the US, not sure if in England). Whether or not many of the mitigation efforts of NY happened in England, isn’t all that necessary to explain the huge peak of deaths early in the outbreak, as the 90 percent death rate among patients on ventilators, combined with the fact ventilators were at that point first line therapy may alone explain most of it.


    1. You are correct of course, though when I refer to “lockdown and catastrophic reorientation of heath care on a national level”, I am referring in fact to a Nazi-style Euthanasia program that I addressed in part 1
      and also back in June 2020.
      Covert 19 – Point 2: T5 Euthanasia Program?
      I’m afraid all these things did indeed also occur in the UK and throughout Europe.
      These measures were and are extremely sinister and bizarre in the sense that the general public hasn’t seemed to have cottoned on to this covert mass homicide.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s